Restore America's Mission

That government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish!

While there is no 28th Amendment (at least not yet), Congress seems required to take ObamaCare, so why aren't they signing up?

From snopes.com:


"Are members of Congress exempt from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act health care legislation?

No. One of the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly known as "Obamacare") passed by Congress is a requirement that lawmakers give up the insurance coverage previously provided to them through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and instead purchase health insurance through the online exchanges that the law created:
(D) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN THE EXCHANGE.

(i) REQUIREMENT — Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the effective date of this subtitle, the only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are:

(I) created under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act); or

(II) offered through an Exchange established under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act).
An August 2013 ruling by the federal Office of Personnel Management (OPM) was widely and inaccurately reported as exempting members of Congress from the requirement that they give up their Federal Employees Health Benefits Program coverage and instead purchase health insurance through online exchanges. That reporting was incorrect: Lawmakers are still required to purchase health insurance through government-created exchanges; what the OPM's ruling actually declared was that members of Congress and their staffs did not have to give up the federal subsidies covering part of the costs of their insurance premiums which they had previously been receiving (and which are afforded to millions of other federal workers)."

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/28thamendment.asp#S3UCDi7oJI...

This is what angers me. Both Pelosi and Reid have proclaimed "it's the law!" We know that. So, either implement fully, as intended, or not at all. It is law, so it needs to be applied equally to all, not exemptions for some big corporations, unions and special interest groups!

Views: 61

Comment

You need to be a member of Restore America's Mission to add comments!

Join Restore America's Mission

Comment by Gregg Veach on October 6, 2013 at 5:54am

Thanks for the comments. Isn't that what I said in the post? I mean, if Congress is not exempt according to "the law" as Reid puts it, but Obama grants it, then that's the problem. I said, either apply ObamaCare according to "the law" of ObamaCare by making Congress and staffers sign up and pay with their OWN MONEY, make Unions, and Corporate America sign up, or EXEMPT EVERYONE, and don't implement it! If it's "the law" then apply it as such, equally, to everyone. Congress voted for it, not us, make Congress face the consequences of it, too! Exempt one group, exempt ALL, or exempt NONE! Simple

Reid, Pelosi, and Obama have all said, "it's the law, get over it!" Well, if indeed, it is in "Affordable" Healthcare Act that Congress must sign up, then apply the law, since The Three Stooges have said, "it can't be changed."

Comment by David Wallace on October 3, 2013 at 9:00am
But, average Americans who go to exchanges lose there employer subsidies. Which is what is happening all over the Country. So the truth is that the OPM rule destroys the equality of the relationship between average Americans and staff members, it creates an elite class that has their cake and they can eat it too. If the Rules apply to average Americans they must apply to Government employees, as well. Also rates are going up, and taxes on the individual mandate are on an escalator each year. The penalties are devastating. And the burden is being shifted to Young Adults. It will devastate them as they are trying to climb up the economic ladder. All wages, all company benefits are borne by the economic activity of any business with incorporated profits, so really this dynamic if squelched or hindered doesn't work in a positive direction nor for the benefit of the employee, as profits get eaten up by an inefficient system.
Comment by Don on October 3, 2013 at 8:56am

I bought in to the OPM Ruling and I must admit that I was wrong.  I was suspicious of Sen. Mikulski who said that they were not exempt.  FEHBP, the Health Package for the Federal Government is a exchange of Insurance Companies that works similar to Obama Care.  Congress is disturbed by the question of whether they should receive the "Stipend" that FEHBP Employees do,  (the government shares the cost of the Insurance), or whether they must pay the total fee "Out of Pocket".   That folks is their delay and problem.  They fear they will lose their Congressional Employees as they jump ship for better offers elsewhere.

It is important for people to know that the FEHBP has remained the same since it was conceived.  It changes every season with offerings worked out between the Companies involved and the OPM, as probably Obamacare will.  For many years it has been the business acumen for Business's, the U.S., Government is no exception,  to assist employees by sharing the cost of the Insurance burden.   In some cases Labor Unions pick this cost up as they will make deals directly with Insurance Companies.  For employees to have to adjust their incomes to pick up the percentage they had previously not been paying is quite a burden.  Such is the case in Congress.

Events

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Investors Business Daily

If GOP Wins Congress, What Are Its 2015 Priorities?

There is no Republican Contract with America in 2014 or plan for the first 100 days if the party can regain control of Congress. For the most part, the GOP has been content to turn the battle for the Senate into a referendum on President Obama, while Democratic candidates have tried their best to distance themselves from the White House. Expectations are modest for what Republicans can get done with at most a slim Senate majority

Homegrown terror strikes next door in Canada

A second deadly attack in Canada this week has delivered the tragic message to America's closest neighbor and trading partner that the deadly war with terror has suddenly arrived there.

Weeks after ISIS called for lone-wolf attacks by any means necessary in allied countries including Canada, a gunman Wednesday shot a guard in the back at Canada's Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Minutes later that gunman or an accomplice entered the main building of Parliament in Ottawa. A prolonged gunfight ensued and the gunman was killed.

The capital's downtown, directly adjacent to the federal complex of buildings, was put in lock-down.

Police later identified the dead gunman as Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, a convert to Islam formerly known as Michael Joseph Hall, with a long record of drug and robbery offenses.

In a nationwide address Wednesday evening, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, a conservative who warned weeks ago that terrorism might come to Canada soon, said:

"In the days to come, we will learn more about the terrorist and any accomplices he may have had. But this week's events are a grim reminder that Canada is not immune to the types of terrorist attacks we have seen elsewhere in the world. Let there be no misunderstanding: We will not be intimidated. Canada will never be intimidated."

The "week's events" he referenced began with a Monday attack just south of Montreal when another Canadian Islam convert ran over two members of the Canadian Forces, killing one. The convert, whose passport had recently been seized as he attempted to travel to Turkey, was shot and killed by police.

Besides being by far the United States' largest trading partner with in excess of $1.5 billion a day crossing the largely undefended border, Canada has been a loyal coalition partner of its southern neighbor. One-hundred-fifty-eight Canadian military members have died alongside Americans in the long war in Afghanistan.

And Harper has also joined Obama's jerry-built coalition to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

House Speaker John Boehner expressed solidarity with Canadian parliamentarians, many of whom had barricaded themselves in meeting rooms during the shootout in the marbled hallways. Boehner said:

"The world is growing more complex and dangerous by..............

Major consumer media study finds liberals far less tolerant than normal people

How do you stack up in a national sampling of political news consumers -- your sources, habits and friends?

A fascinating, major new survey by the Pew Research Journalism Project is examining political polarization in the United States of 2014. The report comes just two weeks before a crucial midterm election that will be widely read as a six-year verdict on Barack Obama's performance and agenda, whatever that is today.

Here are just some of the project's numerous intriguing findings:

* Conservatives tend to flock around one major news source for their news of government and politics -- Fox News -- perhaps because the list of known conservative media consists of Fox News and Fox News. Also Fox News.

* Liberals draw information from a wider variety of media and express far more trust in more major media than do conservatives. Perhaps because there are more liberal-oriented media to trust.

Liberals are much less tolerant than conservatives of political opinions differing from their own, especially on social media, more consistently choosing to Unfriend, Block, Mute or sever friendships with those whose politics they disagree with.

*  Overall, the most-trusted news media was The Economist, though it was recognized by a small sector of respondents. It was followed in trust by another British-based outlet, the BBC. Take that, MSM!

* The least-trusted source overall was BuzzFeed, followed by the radio programs of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Ed Schultz, who was tied as untrusted with Al Jazeera America. Daily Kos was in there too.

* Pew's list of media outlets that were more trusted than distrusted across the political spectrum was lead by the Wall Street Journal. Others more trusted than distrusted to a lesser degree included ABC News, USA Today and Google News.

*  The Center's list of media about equally trusted and distrusted includes the Drudge Report, Daily Show, Huffington Post and Breitbart.

*  Media generally trusted overall include Fox News, Bloomberg, Yahoo News, Washington Post and The Guardian.

Fox's dominance can be explained, for instance, by..............

© 2014   Created by David Wallace.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service