That government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish!
With the Elections 2012, on Tuesday November 6th, Nevada's largest newspaper, yesterday named President Barack Obama an "unworthy commander-in-chief," over his handling of the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans on September 11, 2012.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal published a scathing editorial Thursday that strongly criticizes President Obama's response to the 9/11 attack on our consulate, and sheds new light on the administration's feverish attempts to hide Obama's failure to protect Americans in Benghazi.
"The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away.
It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election."
A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends , and break all bonds of fellowship....we have seen that day, September 11, 2012, Benghazi, Lebanon, the commander in chief failed aid those under his charge so he could be well rested for his Vegas road trip.
Shame on you Obama!
May your name evermore be synonymous with the words, coward, traitor and the like.
I hope from this point ever after, America forgets the name Benedict Arnold, and in its place and stead the name Barak Obama remains forever.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal explicitly applauded Romney's quick response on Sept. 12th while condemning Obama's failed leadership:
"When Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney promptly criticized the security failures in Benghazi, the White House and its lapdog media jumped all over him for another "gaffe," for speaking out too promptly and too strongly.
Prompt and strong action from the White House on Sept. 11 might have saved American lives, as well as America's reputation as a nation not to be messed with.
Weakness and dithering and flying to Las Vegas the next day for celebrity fund-raising parties are somehow better?"
IF a small percentage of Obama's rumors are true (Benghazi) and add in what we KNOW! HE won't wear a pin for America, he won't salute the flag regularly, he can quote the Karan perfectly, he has raised our debt astronomically (I sure haven't received anything extra for it), he flies an extra plane for his dog at our expense (google it).
OK, a portion of Romney's rumors are also true I am sure, he is wealthy (you want someone poor managing our money?), he skimped on taxes (if he followed the law can you blame him?) and made donations to make up the difference (why doesn't that count for something) and has invested with questionable companies.
Now, vote for the guy who for sure has done a lot to bring our country down or vote for a guy who may or may not bring us forward? We know what sucks for our country, lets stop that direction.